Tomiko Okazaki, the chairman of the National Public Safety Commission, insisted, "my activity is the worth to make a successful progress for the national interest." She volunteered to attend at the Korean anti-Japanese protest in Seoul in February, 2003 even if she needed to attend the ordinary session of the Diet at that time. She was asked it at the Lower House of Judicial Committee on 22nd.
The Prime Minister, Naoto Kan, mentioned, "I apologized to mislead the nations for her wrong activity because she was lack of skeptical thinking. It is the result of that the cabinet has failed to lead their leadership and teamwork."
Tomiko Okazaki was clearly by the Korean anti-Japanese protests' side. She even ignored the Japanese flag teared apart in front of her at the event.
However she insisted, "my activity in Korea was not anti-Japanese sentiment." In addition, she also emphasized that she did not even recognized the teared Japanese flag because it was out of her sight at the event. She seemed to mentioned, "both having Japanese flag and singing the national song with respect is important." She also mentioned that she attended the anti-Japanese protest in Korea to show herself as the avatar of the human right. But she doesn't mention the clear details where is the opponent of the human right, even if she opposed against her own country which already respects the human right.
The quetioner, Tomomi Inada, strongly calmed on her, "her actions were improper enough as a Japanese congress-person. She also have to leave her position of the chairman of the National Public Safety Commission."
Democratic party denied Inada's question for Okazaki at The prior commission because, according to the party, her question was improper for the Judicial commission. Conservative party argued, "her question is important for the national benefit." At the last, Democratic party compromised her question.
岡崎公安委員長「反日デモは国益にかなう」民主は質問取り下げ求める
The Prime Minister, Naoto Kan, mentioned, "I apologized to mislead the nations for her wrong activity because she was lack of skeptical thinking. It is the result of that the cabinet has failed to lead their leadership and teamwork."
Tomiko Okazaki was clearly by the Korean anti-Japanese protests' side. She even ignored the Japanese flag teared apart in front of her at the event.
However she insisted, "my activity in Korea was not anti-Japanese sentiment." In addition, she also emphasized that she did not even recognized the teared Japanese flag because it was out of her sight at the event. She seemed to mentioned, "both having Japanese flag and singing the national song with respect is important." She also mentioned that she attended the anti-Japanese protest in Korea to show herself as the avatar of the human right. But she doesn't mention the clear details where is the opponent of the human right, even if she opposed against her own country which already respects the human right.
The quetioner, Tomomi Inada, strongly calmed on her, "her actions were improper enough as a Japanese congress-person. She also have to leave her position of the chairman of the National Public Safety Commission."
Democratic party denied Inada's question for Okazaki at The prior commission because, according to the party, her question was improper for the Judicial commission. Conservative party argued, "her question is important for the national benefit." At the last, Democratic party compromised her question.
岡崎公安委員長「反日デモは国益にかなう」民主は質問取り下げ求める
Comments